SLRSystematic Literature ReviewFrom Literature Discovery to Publication

Stage 3 · 18 November 2026

Crafting the Systematic Literature Review Manuscript

Transform extracted evidence into a coherent scholarly manuscript that answers the review questions.

SYNTHESISE · MAP · THEME · GAP · WRITE
Postgraduate researchers synthesising evidence and writing an SLR manuscript
Write from synthesised evidence
LEARN→DEMONSTRATION→HANDS-ON→DELIVERABLE

Stage 3 guided workspace

Stage 2 produced your final included-study set, PRISMA counts, appraisal results and extraction matrix. In Stage 3, turn that evidence into a synthesis that answers each research question, then draft the manuscript around it.

Follow the seven worksheets in order. They save in this browser; the Portfolio gathers your reviewed outputs.

  1. Prepare the Evidence Base — Confirm the final included-study set and make the extraction matrix analysis-ready.
  2. Choose the Synthesis Approach — Select and justify a synthesis method that fits your RQs and the type of evidence you have.
  3. Descriptive Mapping — Describe the evidence base: when, where, how and by whom the included studies were produced.
  4. Thematic Synthesis by RQ — Move from extracted findings to codes, themes and an answer for each research question.
  5. Research Gaps and Agenda — Derive evidence-based research gaps and turn them into a concrete future research agenda.
  6. Evidence Tables and Figures — Design the core tables and figures that make your synthesis transparent and easy to review.
  7. Draft the Manuscript — Write the first full draft section by section, starting with the parts you already have evidence for.
  8. Review and export the Stage 3 Portfolio

Start Stage 3 step by step → Open Stage 3 Portfolio →

!
Write from evidence, not from memory

Every result statement should be traceable to included studies. AI tools may help organise codes or improve drafts, but authors make and verify every analytical decision.

Stage 3 AI Prompt Toolkit

Copy step-specific prompts with built-in safeguards. Authors retain every analytical and editorial decision.

Open Stage 3 Prompt Toolkit →

Tool guides

Use the separate tool pages for setup and demonstrations. Return to the worksheets to record outputs.

  • VOSviewer — keyword and co-authorship maps for descriptive results.
  • NVivo — code extracted findings and build themes.
  • ATLAS.ti — alternative qualitative coding environment.
  • Gemini Notebook — query selected full texts with citations to verify.
  • diagrams.net — draw conceptual frameworks and PRISMA figures.
  • Zotero — insert and manage citations while drafting.

Stage 3 practice and materials

Practise synthesis on a shared synthetic dataset of six studies.

Open the practice pack → Templates and practice files → Open related learning materials →

TAKE-HOME TASK · BEFORE STAGE 4

Complete the full manuscript draft

Use the synthesis structure practised in Stage 3 to complete a full draft before Stage 4.

  • Finish thematic synthesis for every RQ using all included studies.
  • Complete the tables and figures, including a final PRISMA flow diagram.
  • Draft all manuscript sections and the structured abstract.
  • Bring the full draft, PRISMA checklist (draft), reference library and target journal ideas to Stage 4.
Stage 4 readiness check: A colleague can read your draft and find, for every result, the included studies that support it.
Use the Stage 3 Portfolio checklist →