SLRSystematic Literature ReviewFrom Literature Discovery to Publication

STAGE 3 · GUIDED WRITING WORKSPACE

2. Choose the Synthesis Approach

Select and justify a synthesis method that fits your RQs and the type of evidence you have.

Step 2 of 7
Step by step: Read the guidance, open the linked tools if needed, then record your verified decisions below. Your work is saved in this browser; export the portfolio to keep a backup.
ESTIMATED HANDS-ON TIME25–35 min
You are ready to continue when

You can name the synthesis method, cite a methodological source for it, and explain why it fits your evidence.

Key guidance

ApproachUse whenWhat it involves
Narrative synthesisHeterogeneous designs, contexts and outcomesStructured description of patterns, consistencies and differences supported by tables (Popay et al., 2006).
Thematic synthesisQualitative or mixed findings; RQs about experiences, factors, challengesLine-by-line coding → descriptive themes → analytical themes (Thomas & Harden, 2008).
Framework synthesisA recognised model or taxonomy already existsMap evidence onto an a-priori framework, then refine it (e.g. best-fit framework synthesis).
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)Quantitative outcomes that cannot be pooledGroup studies, standardise metrics and report direction of effect transparently (Campbell et al., 2020).
Meta-analysisComparable designs, populations and outcome measures with effect sizesStatistical pooling; requires heterogeneity assessment and is beyond most computing SLRs.
Bibliometric / mappingRQs about publication trends, venues, collaboration, topic clustersDescriptive counts and science-mapping (co-word, co-citation) to complement, not replace, synthesis.
  • Most SLRs in computing combine a descriptive mapping (who, when, where, how) with a narrative or thematic synthesis for the substantive RQs.
  • Decide the unit of grouping before you write: by RQ, by technique, by application domain, by outcome or by theme.
  • State how study quality is used in the synthesis — e.g. sensitivity reading, weighting of claims, or reporting findings separately for high-quality studies.
Stage 3 output worksheetRecord concise, verified outputs. Keep the full working files (matrices, drafts, reference library) in your own storage.

Choose the Synthesis Approach

A method name alone is not a justification. Link the choice to the RQs, the study designs and the heterogeneity of your evidence.
Saved locally as you type
← Previous